The review process of our journal is based on the principle of Double Anonymous Peer Review, meaning that both authors and reviewers remain anonymous throughout the entire procedure. This double anonymity ensures the highest standards of academic integrity, objectivity, and fairness. Upon submission, each manuscript undergoes an initial editorial screening to verify its relevance, formal compliance, and scholarly suitability. Manuscripts meeting the editorial criteria are then forwarded to two independent expert reviewers. The reviewers evaluate the submission in terms of originality, methodological soundness, theoretical contribution, scholarly rigor, and linguistic clarity. Their recommendations may include: accept without revisions, accept after revisions, resubmit for further review, or reject. The final decision is made by the editorial board based on the reviewers’ reports. The entire process is strictly confidential, and all parties involved are obliged not to share or use submitted materials in any form. To ensure maximum transparency, the principles and structure of the review process are publicly available on the journal’s website. This procedure follows internationally recognized standards of academic quality assurance and guarantees a fair, independent, and transparent evaluation of all submissions.